HARRIS, UPHAM & CO., INC. v. PALIOURAS

No. 7714SC359.

241 S.E.2d 863 (1978)

HARRIS, UPHAM & COMPANY, INC., and its successor, Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Company, Incorporated v. James N. PALIOURAS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 7, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haywood, Denny & Miller, by Egbert L. Haywood, Durham, for plaintiff appellant.

Newsom, Graham, Strayhorn, Hedrick, Murray, Bryson & Kennon, by Josiah S. Murray, III, Durham, for defendant appellee.


BRITT, Judge.

While the able attorneys for the parties have discussed in their respective briefs detailed contentions of their clients relating to various aspects of the trial, we think a proper disposition of the appeals should be made on a consideration of the basic contention of the parties.

Plaintiff contends primarily that this is an action on an account stated; that an account stated was established by the jury's answers to the first five issues; that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases