Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The arbitrator found that the claimant-respondent crossed a road and was struck by a truck while he was "streaking", but that he "was not aware that he was fleeing apprehension" (see Insurance Law, § 672, subd. 2, par [c], cl [i]). That finding is supported by the evidence in the record. The running was not proof, per se, of a flight from apprehension, since an essential aspect of "streaking...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
