GLAMM v. CITY OF AMSTERDAM


94 Misc.2d 991 (1978)

Richard G. Glamm, Plaintiff, v. City of Amsterdam, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Montgomery County.

June 10, 1978


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donohue, Bohl, Clayton & Komar (Howard D. Clayton, Jr., of counsel), for defendant. Robert J. Krzys for plaintiff.


CARROL S. WALSH, J.

Motion by defendant for an "order" dismissing the complaint herein "on the grounds that the Notice of Claim and the summons and complaint were not served within the time provided by Section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, nor within the time prescribed by Section 214 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules". Plaintiff opposes the motion claiming that CPLR 205 (subd [a]) is applicable and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases