1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 44 N.Y.2d
  5. 44 N.Y.2d 1004 (1978)
 

MANDEL v. CITY OF NEW YORK

44 N.Y.2d 1004 (1978)

Edna Mandel, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 6, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur N. Seiff for appellant.

Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Paul T. Rephen and Bernard Burstein of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.

Sidney A. Schwartz and John T. McDonald for Paul Wiener, respondent.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff's proof, viewed in its most favorable light, fails to disclose that under the circumstances present here, the City of New York was negligent in permitting the extraordinary snowfall to exist for an unreasonable period of time or that it had a reasonable opportunity to remedy the condition (Reutlinger v City of New York

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases