1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 246 S.E.2d
  5. 246 S.E.2d 788 (1978)
 

DAUGHTRY v. TURNAGE

No. 95.

246 S.E.2d 788 (1978)

295 N.C. 543

William Corbie DAUGHTRY, Jr. v. William Franklin TURNAGE and J. A. Eubanks and Son, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bowen & Lytch, P. A. by R. Allen Lytch, Dunn, for plaintiff-appellant.

McLeod & Senter, P. A. by William L. Senter, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellee.

COPELAND, Justice.

The sole question presented for our consideration on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict. In passing upon a motion for a directed verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50, the trial court is confronted with substantially the same question as was formerly presented by a motion for judgment of involuntary nonsuit. Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases