The petitioner contends that as a matter of law the respondents erred in computing the parole eligibility dates of multiple offenders by crediting them with time served on a prior undischarged sentence for purposes of the minimum period of a newly imposed concurrent sentence (Penal Law, § 70.30, subd 1, par [a]; § 70.25, subd 1). While petitioner characterizes the credit of time served on prior sentences in computing the minimum served on a subsequent concurrent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
