1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 83 Cal.App.3d
  5. 83 Cal.App.3d 918 (1978)
 

TIEDEMANN v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 42924.

83 Cal.App.3d 918 (1978)

148 Cal. Rptr. 242

JOHN H. TIEDEMANN, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, Respondent; RICHARD S. NAIR, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

August 17, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Boornazian, King & Schulze, James L. McIntosh and Barbara Rosenfeld Davis for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Jay R. Martin, Clinton A. Johnson, Roy H. Ikeda, Christine Helwick and John C. Siegel for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

RACANELLI, P.J.

In this proceeding we consider the question whether an informer's communication to an enforcement agency of the United States Treasury Department concerning a possible perpetration of a tax fraud falls within the scope of absolute privilege under the provisions of section 47, subdivision 2, of the Civil Code.1 We conclude for the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases