Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination of the respondent Secretary of State is supported by substantial evidence and the penalty imposed is not shocking to one's sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BARBARITA v. CUOMO
57 A.D.2d 939 (1977)
Frank Barbarita, as Representative Broker of Frank Barbarita, Inc., Petitioner, v. Mario M. Cuomo, as Secretary of State of The State of New York, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 31, 1977
May 31, 1977
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.