SILKIE v. BARBARINO


55 A.D.2d 910 (1977)

James E. Silkie et al., Respondents, v. Roy J. Barbarino et al., Respondents, and Consolidated Edison, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

January 17, 1977


Order modified by adding thereto a provision that the denial of the appellant's motion is without prejudice to its renewal after the completion of discovery proceedings. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

While we believe, under the circumstances presented here, that Special Term's denial of the appellant's motion for summary judgment was not improper at this stage of the action, we also believe that the appellant should have the opportunity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases