Order affirmed, with costs. In view of the affirmed findings of fact resolved after trial on conflicting evidence, and neither version of the transactions being incredible as a matter of law, this court's constitutional scope of review is limited (see NY Const, art VI, § 3, subd a; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, ch 13). Arguably, indeed, the dissent at the Appellate Division related only to disagreement with the findings of fact and therefore...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
