SMICK v. PIERSON

No. 1786-3.

18 Wn. App. 75 (1977)

566 P.2d 580

HAROLD SMICK, Respondent, v. HAROLD PIERSON, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

July 14, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wallis W. Friel and Irwin, Friel & Myklebust, P.S., for appellants.

J.D. McMannis, Richard G. McBroom, and Snoddy & McBroom, for respondent.


GREEN, J.

Plaintiff, a real estate broker, commenced this action for recovery of a commission arising from a real estate listing agreement. Both parties appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Defendants assign error to several findings of fact and a conclusion of law, and the denial of a motion to dismiss. We reverse, and, in view of this disposition we do not reach plaintiff's cross-appeal.

Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases