Judgment affirmed.
Defendant contends that when the County Court accepted his plea of guilty, there was a failure to ascertain whether he had admitted the necessary element of a larcenous intent. The mere fact that defendant was under the influence of drugs when he committed the crime to which he pleaded guilty does not suffice to exonerate him from criminal responsibility therefor (see People v Davis,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
