The attack made on the denial of that motion specifies alleged impropriety by the hearing Judge as the basis for a new trial; he therefore should not have heard the motion. Indeed, he attempted abortively to refer it elsewhere for decision, but it was returned to him and he decided it. In the circumstances, it is to be heard anew by a Judge to be assigned by the Administrative Judge. The underlying judgment of eviction (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AROL DEV. CORP. v. GOODIE BRAND PACKING CORP.
55 A.D.2d 869 (1977)
Arol Development Corp., Respondent, v. Goodie Brand Packing Corp., Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 6, 1977
January 6, 1977
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
