PRINGLE, Chief Justice.
This matter is before us in an original proceeding wherein we issued a rule to show cause why a motion for new trial filed by petitioner should not be heard on its merits by the respondent judge. We now make the rule absolute.
Petitioner and his wife were engaged in dissolution of marriage proceedings before the respondent judge. On January 20, 1977, the respondent made oral findings with respect to final orders in the case and ordered...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
