Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The agreement between the parties was ambiguous as to whether interest at the rate of 10% should be calculated only on the principal, or on the principal plus the previously accumulated interest. Parol evidence was properly admissible because of this ambiguity. The parol evidence was entirely consistent with the written agreement and supportive of that construction urged by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
