Unanimously affirmed, without costs and disbursements.
Although we affirm the judgment below, Special Term made two observations which we believe to be erroneous. Specifically, the court found that: (1) the agreement of April 23, 1976 is confusing but that the resolution thereof is for the arbitrators; and (2) the validity and justification for respondent's action in withholding the issuance of the promissory note in the sum of approximately four million dollars which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
