Order affirmed. Error, if any there be, with respect to limitation of cross-examination of the witness Hoover was harmless in light of the extensive cross-examination of Hoover establishing his interest in testifying for the People in order to help himself in the criminal prosecution against him and the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt (see People v Crimmins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SOLECKI
42 N.Y.2d 869 (1977)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gerald Solecki, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued May 5, 1977.
Decided June 9, 1977.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.