METZ v. METZ


57 A.D.2d 800 (1977)

Beth B. Metz, Respondent, v. Robert R. Metz, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 19, 1977


There is no statutory predicate to support the direction to maintain a life insurance policy for the benefit of a former wife. (See Domestic Relations Law, § 236; Winter v Winter, 39 A.D.2d 69, affd without opn 31 N.Y.2d 983.) The wife has heretofore paid counsel fees of $12,400. It appears that the fee already paid by the plaintiff amply compensates counsel for the services rendered on her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases