Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant contends that his sentence of 5 to 15 years' imprisonment was excessive and that the court erred in failing to comply with section 70.00 (subd 3, par [b]) of the Penal Law, requiring that when a minimum period of imprisonment is imposed, the court state the reasons therefor. At sentencing the court recommended that defendant receive psychiatric assistance "in overcoming these problems of sexual or deviate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
