RASBERRY v. SPRADLING

No. 77-1969 Summary Calendar.

558 F.2d 257 (1977)

Robert RASBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David SPRADLING, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 26, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam F. Baxter, Dist. Atty., Harrison County, Marshall, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Before COLEMAN, GODBOLD and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

This is a § 1983 prisoner civil rights case. Rather than ruling on the sufficiency of the complaint under standards of Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), the court referred the matter to a Magistrate who made an independent, ex parte factual investigation, including interviews of one or more witnesses.

The Magistrate concluded that plaintiff could not prove any set of facts that would entitle him to recover, and recommended that the case be dismissed as frivolous. The district court accepted the recommendation and dismissed the suit as frivolous. This does not comport with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the governing case law.

VACATED and REMANDED for reconsideration under correct legal standards.

FootNotes


* Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases