This case was commenced by service of process in June, 1969; it was not until December, 1976 that defendant's counsel — there had been some 30 of them in the intervening period — moved in the trial part for a jury. Meanwhile, issue had been joined by service of an answer, consolidation with other actions, a note of issue without a jury demand, a notice of trial followed by an unsuccessful motion to strike from the nonjury calendar as premature — all without...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
