Appellant was found to be one of three youths who assaulted and took a radio from complainant. The same day complainant, in the presence of the police, identified appellant on the street and later again after appellant had been taken into custody. This could not be deemed impermissibly suggestive but, in any event, the facts indicate complainant had an independent source for his in-court identification. The court found that appellant was not the one who struck the complainant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
