Ardythe Canfield appeals from the order denying her petition for a writ of mandate directing respondent, the Director of the Department of Benefit Payments (hereinafter referred to as Director or Department) to set aside his administrative decision denying her claim for attendant care grants under the Aid to the Totally Disabled (ATD) program (formerly Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 13500-13801).
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CANFIELD v. PROD
Docket No. 38006.
67 Cal.App.3d 722 (1977)
137 Cal. Rptr. 27
ARDYTHE CANFIELD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JEROLD A. PROD, as Director, etc., Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 1, 1977.
February 1, 1977.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Carol R. Golubock for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Elizabeth Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel Johnson, Jr., and John Fourt, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
