Order affirmed.
WATKINS, P.J., and JACOBS, J., dissent.
VAN der VOORT, J., respectfully dissents from the Order affirming the discharge of the defendant in this case upon the grounds that Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100(f) has been violated by the Commonwealth for the reasons set forth in his Dissenting Opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. Shields,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.