1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 442 F.Supp.
  5. 442 F.Supp. 341 (1977)
 

MILLER & RHOADS v. WEST

Civ. A. No. 77-0420-R.

442 F.Supp. 341 (1977)

MILLER AND RHOADS v. Steven WEST et al.

United States District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division.

December 2, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Farnham, Jack E. McClard and Dale A. Oesterle, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, Va., for plaintiff.

Robert A. Pustilnik, Richmond, Va., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

WARRINER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion of 3 October 1977 to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the above styled action. Defendants' motion to dismiss is based upon: (1) lack of jurisdiction over the person of the defendants; (2) improper venue; (3) ineffective service of process; (4) unconstitutional service of process; and (5) the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases