GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
The party insured by a contract of title insurance brought this suit against the insurer for expenses incurred in defending a suit for an undivided interest in the property covered by the contract. The insurer had refused to defend the earlier suit on the ground that it was a type of suit excluded from coverage by the terms of the contract. In the cause now on appeal, the trial court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for the insured...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
