Petitioner was arrested on April 27, 1975 for driving while intoxicated and it is conceded that he thereafter refused to consent to a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood. The issue is whether he was first adequately warned of the consequences such a refusal might entail (see Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1194, subd 2). The referee found, and this finding too is not disputed, that the arresting officer had informed petitioner "if you refuse to submit...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
