RESCIGNO v. PICINICH


151 N.J. Super. 587 (1977)

377 A.2d 733

PETER J. RESCIGNO, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN A. PICINICH, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided June 30, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Rooney, Peduto & Rooney, attorneys for plaintiff (Mr. John Peduto appearing).

Mr. Robert F. Colquhoun for defendant (Mr. James Sullivan, appearing).


YOUNG, J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.

The efforts of plaintiff, Peter J. Rescigno, in resisting a motion for an order of summary judgment present for determination questions which require an interpretation and application of the terms of the tort liability exemption section of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (No-Fault Law). More particularly, should this court extend the discovery rule to an auto negligence action in which permanent injuries are

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases