KOSTIKA v. CUOMO


41 N.Y.2d 673 (1977)

Miriam Kostika, Respondent, v. Mario Cuomo, as Secretary of State, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 5, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (David L. Birch and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for appellants.

Benjamin H. Segal, New York City, for respondent.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur with Judge WACHTLER; Judge JASEN dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the concurring memorandum by Mr. Justice VINCENT A. LUPIANO at the Appellate Division.


WACHTLER, J.

The sole issue presented in this case is whether the penalty imposed by the Secretary of State against the petitioner real estate broker was "`so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness'" (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233, quoting Matter of Stolz v Board of Regents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases