In re JAY J., A Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
KENNETH F. FARE, as Acting Chief Probation Officer, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
JAY J., Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 31, 1977.
January 31, 1977.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
COUNSEL
Paul Halvonik, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Charles M. Sevilla, Chief Assistant State Public Defender, Laurance S. Smith and Edward H. Schulman, Deputy State Public Defenders, for Defendant and Appellant.
Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Jack R. Winkler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, S. Clark Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Katz and Ronald N. Ito, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.
OPINION
THOMPSON, J.
This appeal from an order adjudicating Jay J. a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 asserts that the California Juvenile Court Law which allows a juvenile a full trial before a judge as a matter of right only when the proceedings before a juvenile court referee are not reported and transcribed denies the juvenile due process...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.