COMMONWEALTH v. HEIPLE & ROOKER

No. 2.

3 Pa. D. & C. 3d 65 (1977)

Commonwealth v. Heiple & Rooker

Common Pleas Court of Somerset County, Pennsylvania.

February 3, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Hartman, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth.

James B. Yelovich, and Kimmel, Rascona, Yelovich & Bowman, for defendants.


COFFROTH, P.J., February 3, 1977.

We have for consideration defendants' objections to venue, requesting that the summary prosecution filed against them in magisterial district six be transferred to magisterial district three because the alleged offense occurred in Allegheny Township (part of district three) instead of Brothersvalley Township (part of district six).

The Commonwealth contends that the alleged violation actually occurred on the boundary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases