Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied.
Plaintiff-respondent commenced this action based upon defendant-appellant's negligence in the operation of his car, claiming $250,000 in damages. Contemporaneously, plaintiff proceeded under the "no-fault" provisions of article 18 of the Insurance Law solely against defendant's insurer, which had failed to honor plaintiff's claim, and he demanded arbitration. A motion to stay arbitration was denied...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.