Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Neither a police officer nor his employer is subject to a claim of malicious prosecution, false arrest or false imprisonment for executing a certificate of commitment which appears valid on its face. Neither a town nor its employees may be held liable for carrying out an erroneous judicial mandate where the court had jurisdiction over the party and the subject matter involved (cf. Szerlip v Finnegan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.