HOLT, Justice.
This appeal presents the issue whether the appellant city or the appellee Arkla must pay for the cost of moving appellee's main pipeline which was necessitated by a street improvement project initiated by the appellant. The chancellor held that the city should pay Arkla $15,000 for the costs it incurred by the relocation. Appellant first contends the chancellor erred in finding that the city annexed the "road subject to Arkla's pre-existing right-of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
