Judgment affirmed.
Assuming, arguendo, that cross-examination of appellant as to a contemporaneous rape charge, which had been previously dismissed for lack of corroboration, was error, we find it to have been harmless in the light of the fact that this was a nonjury trial. Further, the evidence of guilt was virtually overwhelming (see People v Crimmins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
