SMITH, Judge.
The appellant was convicted of unlawfully entering an automobile. The sole contentions of the appeal are that the appellant's trial counsel was ineffective in the presentation of the defense, and that the trial court erred in failing to charge on the defense of alibi. We find merit in neither, and affirm.
1. The standard for determining whether a criminal defendant had the effective assistance of counsel is discussed in Pitts v. Glass,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
