ROSS v. ROSS

No. 761DC888.

235 S.E.2d 405 (1977)

Jeanette Finnegan ROSS v. George Jay ROSS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 15, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Twiford, Seawell, Trimpi & Thompson by Russell E. Twiford, Elizabeth City, and Wallace R. Gray, Manteo, for plaintiff-appellee.

LeRoy, Wells, Shaw, Hornthal, Riley & Shearin, P.A. by Roy A. Archbell, Jr., Kitty Hawk, for defendant-appellant.


MORRIS, Judge.

By his initial assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge erred in denying his motion for a more definite statement. Of course, the grant or denial of a motion for a more definite statement rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge, Mitchell v. E-Z Way Towers, Inc., 269 F.2d 126 (5th Cir. 1959), and his ruling thereon will not be overturned on appeal absent a showing of abuse of discretion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases