Although defendant appeared at Special Term for deposition pursuant to prior order of the court, nevertheless, the witness it produced, then employed by defendant, did not have personal knowledge of the facts. It appears that a witness who may have such knowledge, the store manager at the time of the occurrence was, apparently, no longer in defendant's employ and not subject to defendant's control. Furthermore, defendant at the deposition brought certain records. Claiming...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
