The trial court found that plaintiff subcontractor had substantially performed the work and supplied the materials required by his contract with defendant Modular, the contractor. It further found that discontinuance of the job by defendant Modular, without fault of plaintiff, kept plaintiff from completing the balance of the work and prevented compliance with the condition precedent which required that defendant Modular receive final payment from the owner before plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
