The fundamental issue posed by this mandamus proceeding to compel the sustaining of a general demurrer of petitioner, the City of Los Angeles, to the third cause of action of the second amended complaint of the real party in interest, Northrop Institute of Technology, is whether the recently enacted Government Code section 905.1, eliminating the claim-filing requirement as a precondition to the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. SUPERIOR COURT
Docket No. 50603.
73 Cal.App.3d 509 (1977)
142 Cal. Rptr. 292
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; NORTHROP INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Real Party in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 4, 1977.
August 4, 1977.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Burt Pines, City Attorney, Lawrence M. Nagin, Senior Assistant City Attorney, and James L. Spitser, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
John J. Schimmenti for Real Party in Interest.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
