Our review of the record indicates that the award of alimony was excessive to the extent indicated. With regard to the counsel fees awarded at Trial Term, it appears that the plaintiff has means to pay the fee, and therefore it should not have been included in the award. To the extent reimbursement may be sought for payments made by her father, his recovery must be predicated on an action for necessaries (Kann v Kann,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PELTZ v. PELTZ
56 A.D.2d 519 (1977)
Nancy M. Peltz, Respondent-Appellant, v. George M. D. Peltz, IV, Appellant-Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 3, 1977
February 3, 1977
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
