CLARK v. LAUGHLIN

Docket No. 37837.

68 Cal.App.3d 506 (1977)

137 Cal. Rptr. 354

ALYSON CLARK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM A. LAUGHLIN, Defendant and Appellant, SHIRL S. FOX, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

March 29, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Crist, Crist, Griffiths, Bryant & Schulz, Robert E. Schulz and Patricia J. Gebala for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Mead & Bradley, John S. Mead, Robert A. Seligson and Patrick A. Nielson for Defendant and Appellant and for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

TAYLOR, P.J.

Defendant, William A. Laughlin (hereafter Dr. Laughlin), an orthodontist, appeals1 from an adverse judgment entered on a jury verdict in an action for malpractice. His major contention on appeal is that the trial court's comments on a portion of the evidence exceeded the permissible perimeters of article VI, section 10 of the state Constitution and therefore constituted prejudicial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases