PER CURIAM.
There was evidence from which the jury was authorized to find that the plaintiff, formerly the defendant's wife, was entitled to a one-half interest in the residence and that the defendant had conveyed that interest fraudulently. It follows that the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motions for directed verdict and new trial.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
