MEAD v. U. S. FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO.

Civ. Nos. 4-77-16, 4-77-42.

442 F.Supp. 114 (1977)

Sheila MEAD and Terry Oakley, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, L. K. Merz, Howard Gould, Robert Rowe, and John H. Aitken, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

September 14, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank E. Vogl, Frederick W. Morris, Thomas D. Carlson, Best & Flanagan, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs.

Grant E. Morris, Katherine Savers McGovern, E.E.O.C., Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-intervenor.

Timothy R. Thornton, David J. Byron, Rider, Bennett, Egan, Johnson & Arundel, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendants.


FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, ORDER FOR JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF MEAD'S § 704(a) RETALIATORY DISCHARGE CLAIM

MILES W. LORD, District Judge.

JURISDICTION

This matter originally came on for hearing on plaintiff Sheila Mead's Motion for Temporary and Preliminary Relief filed on January 13, 1977, and plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Petition for Temporary Relief filed on February 1, 1977, pursuant to Section 706(f)(1)(2)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases