HOGAN v. BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORP.


151 N.J. Super. 344 (1977)

376 A.2d 1277

PETER HOGAN, PLAINTIFF, v. BERGEN BRUNSWIG CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided June 27, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard D. Schibell for plaintiff (Messrs. Shebell & Schibell, attorneys).

Mr. Murray J. Laulicht, for defendant (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, attorneys).


YACCARINO, J.S.C.

The issue presented by the facts of this case is whether continued employment constitutes consideration sufficient to support an employee's restrictive covenant not to engage in post-employment solicitation of customers. Although the court concludes herein that a number of reported decisions require an answer in the negative, the law of this State has been stated to be the contrary by secondary authority, mandating judicial exposition of the issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases