PALKO v. PALKO


73 N.J. 395 (1977)

375 A.2d 625

VERNA MAY PALKO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DANIEL PALKO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 19, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick J. Rossi argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Wegner & Wegner, attorneys).

Mr. Walter R. Dewey argued the cause for defendant-respondent.

Mr. David J. Goldberg argued the cause for respondent Linda Palko (Mr. George Warren, Guardian ad Litem, pro se, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division and remand the matter for hearing to the trial court substantially for the reasons given by Judge Seidman in his dissenting opinion. 150 N.J.Super. 255 (1976). We add the following comments.

While the affidavits supporting plaintiff's motion to reopen the judgment use the terms "deception," "fraud" and "concealment," the substance of her application may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases