UHLENHOPP, Justice.
This appeal involves three issues which arose in a prosecution for soliciting for prostitution under § 724.2, Code 1975.
I. Defendant Arlethia Williams objected at trial to testimony by Detective Douglas Hansel about a tip he received prior to the events in question which subsequently led to those events and to the prosecution. This testimony was admissible under State v. Rush,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.