BOARD OF MED. EXAMINERS v. TERMINAL-HUDSON ELEC.

Docket No. 49970.

73 Cal.App.3d 376 (1977)

140 Cal. Rptr. 757

BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v. TERMINAL-HUDSON ELECTRONICS, INC. OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; CALIFORNIA OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, Intervener, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

September 15, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Charles W. Anshen for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, and Alvin J. Korobkin, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt & Gray, William A. Gould, Jr., and Alan G. Perkins for Intervener, Cross-defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

HANSON, J.

Terminal-Hudson Electronics, Inc. of California, dba Opti-Cal (hereinafter referred to as Opti-Cal.), has filed an appeal from the judgment of April 27, 1976, in which the superior court in an action filed by the Board of Medical Examiners, State of California, and the Board of Optometry, State of California (hereinafter referred to collectively as the Board), permanently enjoined and restrained Opti-Cal from advertising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases