STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
FRANK LEONARDIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
STEPHEN ROSE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MICHAEL BATTAGLIA AND DALE BATTAGLIA, DEFENDANTS. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FREDRICK JOHN STRYCHNEWICZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Reargued November 8, 1976.
Decided May 31, 1977.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. Robert J. Del Tufo, Director, Division of Criminal Justice, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney pro se; Mr. Lowell Espey, Mr. David S. Baime and Mr. John De Cicco, of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. Richard J. Williams argued the cause for amicus curiae County Prosecutors' Association of New Jersey.
Mr. William Z. Shulman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the State of New Jersey (Mr. James T. O'Halloran, Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney).
Mr. David A. Pressler argued the cause for amicus curiae Bergen County Bar Association (Mr. Michael J. Breslin, on the brief).
Mr. Ezra D. Rosenberg, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for defendant Leonardis and for amicus curiae Public Defender in Strychnewicz (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).
Mr. Gary H. Schlyen and Mr. Joseph J. Rodgers submitted a brief on behalf of intervenor Passaic County Prosecutor (Mr. Burl Ives Humphreys, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney pro se).
Mr. Ervan F. Kushner submitted a brief as amicus curiae.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PASHMAN, J.
In State v. Leonardis,71 N.J. 85 (1976) (hereinafter "Leonardis"), this Court considered the validity of pretrial intervention programs adopted by Bergen and Hudson Counties pursuant to R. 3:28.1 In that opinion we fully outlined the history of pretrial intervention (PTI) and the policy considerations which led to the adoption of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
