1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 147 N.J.
  5. 147 N.J. Super. 279 (1977)
 

MOHR v. B.F. GOODRICH RUBBER COMPANY

147 N.J. Super. 279 (1977)

371 A.2d 288

ROBERT W. MOHR AND DOROTHY MOHR, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. B.F. GOODRICH RUBBER COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 8, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel C. Inglese argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Moss and Inglese, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas T. Chappell argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lamb, Hutchinson, Chappell, Ryan & Hartung, attorneys; Mr. Thomas T. Chappell, of counsel; Ms. Mary B. Rogers on the brief).

Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.

PER CURIAM.

This is a product liability case wherein plaintiff Robert W. Mohr seeks damages for injuries suffered when a tire manufactured by defendant B.F. Goodrich Rubber Company (Goodrich) exploded while Mohr was mounting it on a rim. The central issue contested at the jury trial was whether the tire blew up because of a manufacturing defect in the bead1 of the tire or because of the manner in which Mohr undertook to mount it. His wife...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases